Nashville Tea Party 7/2/09
59
![]() | Amazon Price: $7.47 List Price: $14.95 |
Amazon Price: $10.30 List Price: $12.50 | |
Amazon Price: $9.87 List Price: $9.89 | |
Amazon Price: $6.99 List Price: $14.95 |
Celebrating Independence
July 2, 2009, 6:00 PM Central- The Nashville Tea Party was energetic. The crowd got larger as evening wore on. Guest speakers included Ralph Bristol of Nashville Talk Radio, TN Republican Candidate for Govenor Bill Gibbons, representatives of the National Tax Payer Union & Fair Tax Association and keynote speaker the Rev. Jesse Lee Petersen. Unfortunately, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (TN-R) could'nt attend. However, she sent her apologies. Saying something to the effect that she could'nt attend for she wanted to be with her newborn grandson and considering he was already born with thousands of dollars of debt she had to find him a job right away.
Music and conversation were in full force as Tennesseans expressed their 1st Amendment right to assemble. It was a pretty eclectic group. Conversations ran the gamut of taxes, energy and other social issues with an underlying genuine concern for the future of the Nation. All in all it was good to meet and talk with like minded people. My wife Joom, who just became a citizen got to see first hand one the principles that made this country great; decked out in her new NObama pin. They should have known she was going to be trouble when she answered one the examiners questions during her citizenship exam. He asked her "which political party does the current President belong to". To which she replied "socialist". Nevertheless, the examiner turned beet red. Not with anger, but with laughter. It just goes to show that they all don't think lock step down at Homeland Security. I asked her what she would have said if they told her she couldn't say that. She said in her thick Thai accent "I can, that free speech, it right here"; pointing to her pocket Constitution. I think every American should be required to take the same exam every year. We may actually see some improvment.
All in all, it was good to see people concerned about the affairs of their country. The band was great and the speakers poignant...and "No", Michael Jackson wasn't even a topic of discussion. Too all, have a Happy 4th and lets remember what Samuel Adams said 233 years ago to stay strong and committed to do our part "It does not take a majority to prevail ... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush-fires of freedom in the minds of men."
What do Americans want from their government?
See results without voting
CommentsLoading...
There is another in Nashville in Feb, next year I believe. The ridicule of the Tea Party movement cast by liberal media and the left should make it that much more relevant to the middle and the right. We need to stop this increasing government encroachment and influence on our lives, and make our voices heard. I am just hoping that there will emerge an actual leader capable of rallying the real support rather than all of these disorganized factions that threaten the cause.
As Ben Franklin was quoted: (paraphrasing) If we do not stand together, surely we will hang separately.









![Grover Norquist and the Tea Party Got Their Wish, They Broke America: The "Super Committee Fails" [106*7] Grover Norquist and the Tea Party Got Their Wish, They Broke America: The "Super Committee Fails" [106*7]](http://s4.hubimg.com/u/5792987_50.jpg)

![An Analysis of the Right-Wing Authoritarian Follower (RWA): Insight into Tea Party and Congressional Gridlock [105-17] An Analysis of the Right-Wing Authoritarian Follower (RWA): Insight into Tea Party and Congressional Gridlock [105-17]](http://s3.hubimg.com/u/5782570_50.jpg)

dutchman1951 2 years ago
Obama’s fighting for a Revolution for change in the US? It is possible folly, or something hidden?
Given President Obama’s propensity for radical thought, his background- his all out push for change, I became curious as to this President I voted for. His insight and mind set. Where possibly his thinking is coming from. I am honestly trying to understand him, by looking at what he reads, says in speeches, the people he be-friends and appointments he makes. I feel I have stumbled upon something I personally find concerning.
I was looking into his announced summer reading, and found some Interesting, not alarming, but interesting books full of theory and possibilities. And it has made me question.
If I may:
I am speaking directly to one of his chosen books for my argument.
The Book, John Adams by David McCullough; pages 410 and 411. A Quote from Adams in a letter to his friend Rush. “A hundred years hence, absolute monarchy will probably be rendered necessary in our country by the corruption of our people!”
In his letter, John Adams was not proposing Monarchy what so ever, just saying it was conceivable in a corrupt society, making things ripe for take over, A reference to France at that time I believe.
But having been once an impressionistic kid in college, and miss-interpreting things slanted to a radical outlook. Having made those mistakes myself. I do believe that Ideas and Ideals can come out of books. Miss-represented or not.
That said and given Obama’s some what idealistic and younger aggressive mindset, that I have seen at times? And, adding to it possibilities of a more radical outlook on America from childhood as well as an aggressive Harvard Education? I have to ask- Is it possible?
Is it possible Our President views history, not as it was then, but try’s to apply it to us, Idealistically as times are now?
He seems, at present to need an escape, buffer time to re-calculate; and I am beginning to wonder if he is a bit axiomatic in his passion to his politics. Is he learning as he goes? Taking pages from impressionistic times in our Nations past history, Possibly miss-applying them in today’s affairs. Does he really have a firm plan? Or is he more loose- Eclectic?
John Adams proposed an Independent Executive, away from Legislative influences, wanted total freedom to appoint judges, make independent decisions. He, Adams, voted against the McLay Bill, denying Congress the right to dismiss cabinet officers. Claimed he felt forced to agree with President Washington at the time.
In truth He believed in solemn rights of the Executive, disliked dealing in political compromise. Seemed weary of compromise and political opposite. He wrote of his ideals in his pamphlets and in the papers he drafted that eventually became the Groundwork for the Massachusetts Constitution.
Thinking on this, and the fervor of idealism which to me President Obama sometimes shows. I Have to wonder if they share similar Personality traits.
Now we are told he is contemplating writing his own version of the heath care Bill.
I think of another one of the Books; FDR, The First 100 Days; and reflect on Shovel ready jobs. Temporary Jobs that last the better of 18 months, that can not stimulate a Long term economical growth?
I feel I have to ask the following questions.
Are the Czars a way to bypass the Cabinet?
Is organizing the youth Army a way to teach of so-called Change needed in the Constitution?… push it by rallying the vote with gang-like force to get his way?
Claiming the Legislative branch is broken, corrupt. Can he deal in compromise? Can he Stand the amount of time it takes for check and balance to work well?
Is this the Change he meant?
A one party Take over? A concealed form of monarchy?
Or at best, a change to exclusive powers of the Executive Branch.?
Does he see us as really that corrupt, that compromise and sense can not prevail, and we need to destroy check and balance?
I read most of the books he chose for this summers reading, and I came to See many examples of similar thoughts and Ideals all though them and I wonder of the Impressions he will draw from them.. Frankly, it has me re-questioning my Democratic Vote.
How does this President really see this Country? Can he really handle, or tolerate this system?
I think now of when Our heath care bill passes- and it will. What if this Bill is really a mess, and he sees that it is? He does not have line item veto.
Will he be honest and say its no good for “all“ of America?
Or will he default to party line and say, “Here it is, I kept my Promise?”
Can he really handle the responsibility to administer to all people in the US, Or is his Vision more covert?
Will he miss-apply conceived History?
I am a little concerned.
Jon in Nashville